Klasifikasi Perbuatan Advokat Dalam Tindak Pidana Obstruction Of Justice Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Pidana
Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 3315 K/Pid.Sus/2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/mateandrau.v3i2.2897Keywords:
Classification, Criminal Acts, Obstruction Of Justice, Criminal LawAbstract
The existence of a code of professional ethics is very important in order to keep advocates in practice or law does not come out of the values of the profession. The code of ethics is also needed to maintain that advocates serve the interests of the community and maintain the trust that has been given by the community to the community. The purpose of this study to determine the classification of criminal acts obstruction of justice in Decision No. 3315 K/Pid.Sus/2018. The act of the defendant who contacted and met with Doctor Bimanesh Sutarjo to ask for help so that his client could be hospitalized at the Medika Permata Hijau hospital with a diagnosis of several diseases, one of which was hypertension", with the aim of avoiding the KPK investigation was not an act carried out in connection with his professional duties, and the act was clearly an act without being based on good faith so that it was an act that could be classified as an act of obstruction of justice in decision 3315 K/Pid.Sus/2018
References
Arif, K. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Imunitas Advokat Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Iqtisad, 5(1) Juni pp.31. http://dx.doi.org/10.31942/iq.v5i1. 2206
Atmaja, Ida Wayan Dharma Punia., & Suardana, I Wayan., & Wirasila, AA Ngurah. (2018). Hak Imunitas Advokat dalam Persidangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(5), pp.1-13 https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/43617
Bijayanti., & Darmadi. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Advokat pada Obstruction of Justice dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Kertha Wicara, 9(4) Maret, pp.46-55 https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/a rticle/view/58244
Ilham. (2014). MK Tegaskan Imunitas Advokat di Dalam dan di Luar Pengadilan. Retrieved from https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berit a&id=9899#
Kailimang.” Organisasi Advokat ke Depan Layaknya 'Perseroan Terbatas”, http://www. hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol10858/kailimang-organisasi-advokat-ke-depan-layaknya-perseroan-terbatas. Diakses tanggal 2 Oktober 2011.
Luhut M.P. Pangaribuan, (1996). Advokat dan Contempt of Court Satu Proses di Dewan Kehormatan Profesi, (Jakarta : Djambatan, 1996), hal. 1.
Loi. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Hak Imunitas Seorang Advokat yang Melakukan Tindakan Obstruction of Justice dalam Perkara Korupsi (Contoh Putusan Nomor 90/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3(1) Juli, p.704. https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/adigama/ar ticle/viewFile/8953/5737
Nugroho, Satrio S. (2020). Batasan Hak Imunitas Advokat. Retrieved from https://fjplaw. com/id/batasan-hak-imunitasadvokat/#:~:text=Pasal%20tersebut%20dapat %20dikutip%20sebagai,maupun%20di%20luar %20sidang%20pengadilan
Nyoman & Purwoto. (2017) Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Advokat Pelaku Tindak Pidana Suap terhadap Hakim (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1319k/pid. sus/2016). Diponegoro Law Review 6(2), pp.1-15. http://www.ejournals1.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr
Rakinaung, Vicky Y. (2019). Kajian Hukum Terhdap Pengacara yang dengan Sengaja menghalangi, Mempersulit Jalannya Penyidikan, Penuntutan serta Proses Peradilan terhadap Terdakwa dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 8(4) April, p.192. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index. php/lexcrimen/article/view/25669/25321
Rompis. (2013). Kewenangan Advokat Didalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Guna Menunjang Sistem Peradilan Terpadu. Lex et Societatis, 1(2) April, p.126. https://doi.org/10.357 96/les.v1i2.1756
Sartono & Bhekti Suryani, S.IP, 2010, Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Advokat, Dunia Cerdas, Jakarta Timur, hlm 99
Supriadi, 2006, Etika & Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum Di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, hlm.66.
Vandervort, L. (2001). Mistake of Law and Obstruction of Justice : A Bad Excuse Even for a Lawyer. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, Vol.50, p.174 https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/unblj/articl e/view/29482
Winata., & Dewanto. (2020). Batasan terhadap Imunitas Advokat yang Diperluas Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1) Februari-Juli, pp.45-46. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v16i1.2974
KUHP
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN, BAHASA, SASTRA, SENI, DAN BUDAYA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
