Peningkatan Motivasi Belajar Pak Dengan Model Pbl Materi Gereja Pada Fase F Kelas XI SMKN 3 Magelang

Authors

  • Didit Sugiyarso STPKat St. Fransiskus Asisi
  • Stepanus Istata Raharjo STPKat St. Fransiskus Asisi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/semnaspa.v4i1.384

Keywords:

learning motivation, critical reasoning ability, PBL

Abstract

There is a problem of a lack of motivation to learn and critical reasoning abilities in students in learning Catholic Religious Education and Characteristics in terms of competency achievement, students are able to understand the meaning and meaning of the Church in Phase F of Class XI SMKN 3 Magelang in the 2023/2024 academic year. So this research aims :

Knowing the effectiveness of applying the PBL learning model in increasing motivation and critical reasoning skills in learning Catholic Religious Education and Characteristics in terms of competency achievement, students are able to understand the meaning and meaning of the Church in Phase F Class XI SMKN 3 Magelang in the 2023/2024 academic year. This type of research is Classroom Action Research using 2 cycles. With research variables learning motivation, critical reasoning and Problem Based Learning techniques. The population of students who are Catholics at SMK Negeri 3 Magelang. The sample of class XI students is Catholic with a total of 4 students. Data collection techniques in this study were observation and questionnaires. Cycle 1 motivation obtained the highest interest questionnaire score of 27 on behalf of Chornelia in the competent category, the lowest score of 15 on behalf of Agatha was included in the appropriate category. If seen from the average interest score of 20.5 in cycle 1, this is included in the proficient category. Attention in cycle 1 gets an overview of the highest score of 26 on behalf of Chornelia including the proficient category, the lowest score on behalf of 15 Agatha is included in the appropriate category. The average attention score of 20.3 in cycle 1 is included in the proficient category. Meanwhile, the highest participation score of 25 on behalf of Cornelia is in the competent category, while the lowest score of 16 is in the appropriate category. The average participation score of 20.3 is included in the proficient category.The results of the study show that the percentage of motivation in cycle 1 is only 51% of the motivation that appears in learning, so it needs to be increased again so that learning objectives are achieved. Critical reasoning ability Cycle 1 obtained the highest critical reasoning questionnaire score of 22 on behalf of Chornelia included in the proficient category, the lowest score of 8 on behalf of Agatha was included in the appropriate category. If seen from the average score, a score of 14 is included in the feasible category. So it is necessary to increase the ability of critical reasoning so that learning objectives can be achieved optimally. The percentage of critical reasoning abilities shows that the ability of students has only reached 50%, so there is also a need for improvement so that learning objectives can be achieved optimally. Furthermore, cycle 2 motivation obtained the highest interest questionnaire score of 37 on behalf of Cornelia included in the proficient category, the lowest score of 19 on behalf of Agatha was included in the appropriate category. If seen from the average interest score of 29.8 in cycle 2, this is included in the proficient category. Attention in cycle 2 gets an overview of the highest score of 34 on behalf of Chornelia including the proficient category, the lowest score on behalf of 19 Agatha is included in the appropriate category. The average attention score of 28.3 in cycle 1 is included in the proficient category. While the highest participation score of 34 on behalf of Cornelia is in the proficient category, the lowest score is 21 in the proficient category. The average participation score of 27.8 is included in the proficient category. The percentage of critical reasoning abilities in cycle 2 can be seen that only 78% of students have motivation that appears in learning, already showing an increase in achieving learning goals. The final conclusion is that the use of the PBL model in teaching Catholicism in Church material for class XI SMKN 3 Magelang can increase motivation and critical thinking skills.

References

Arends, Richard I. (2007). Learning to Teach Seventh Edition. New York: The. McGraw Hill Companies

Arikunto, Surhasimi. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

David Boud. (2010). Problem-based Learning in Education for the Professions. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia

Dalyono. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineke Cipta. Mahmud, Dimyati.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2002). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dokpen KWI. (1993). Dokumen Konsili Vatikan II. Jakarta : Obor

Erly Lumban Gaol,dkk. Komkat KWI. (2009). Pendidikan Agama Katolik dan Budi Pekerti SMA/SMK Kelas XI. Yogyakarta : Kanisius.

Erly Lumban Gaol,dkk. Komkat KWI.(2023). Pendidikan Agama Katolik dan Budi Pekerti SMA/SMK Kelas XI. 2023. Yogyakarta : Kanisius.

Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia. (1987). Alkitab. Jakarta:Obor.

UU 20/2003, tentang Sistim Pendidikan Nasional pasal 3.

Maman Sutarman dan Sulis Bayu Setyawan. (2017). Pendidikan Agama Katolik dan Budi Pekerti SMA/SMK Kelas XI. 2014. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Nomor 262/M/2022, tentang tentang Perubahan Atas Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 56/M/2022 Tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran.

Oemar Hamalik. (2003). Kurikulum Dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Santrock, John W. (2011). “Educational Psychology 5th Edition.” Educational Psychology.

Sardiman. (2003). l Interaksi Dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Shoimin, A. (2017). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar Ruzz Media.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hapsari, Sri . (2005). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Pt Remaja Rosdakarya. M. Tan, Oon-Seng. (2003). Problem Based Learning Innovation: Using Problem to. Power Learning in 21st Century. Singapore: Thompson Learning

Terry Barrett. (2011). New Approaches to problem based learning. Dublin: University College Dublin

Warsono & Hariyanto. (2013). Pembelajaran Aktif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sumber Internet

Abdiana Gulo. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar IPA, Vol.1 No.1 (2022) Educativo : Jurnal Pendidikan diakses pada tanggal tanggal 9 Agustus 2023. Dari :

https://www.educativo.marospub.com/index.php/journal/article/view/58

Anisatul Farida. “ Penerapan Model Pembelajaran ARCS pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Diskrit di Program Studi Teknik Informatika STMIK Duta Bangsa”. Jurnal Saintech Vol 1 No 5 (2016). Diakses pada tanggal 13 Juli 2023. Dari :

https://sainstech.poltekindonusa.ac.id/index.php/view/article/view/71

Agustin Sukses Dakhi. “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa”. Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan. Vol.8.No.2 (2020) p.468 diakses pada tanggal 11 Juli 2023. Dari :

https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/1758

Budi Santoso. Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah siswa melalui model Problem Based Learning Berbantu Alat Peraga Konsep Gerak Lurus.Vol. 3 No. 1 April (2020): Jurnal Kumparan Fisika diakses pada tanggal 9 Agustus 2023. Dari :

https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/kumparan_fisika/article/view/9830

Lilik Subagio. Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dengan Menerapkan Model Discovery-Learning dan Problem-Based-Learning Berbantuan Geogebra.Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021) / Articles. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia diakses pada tanggal 9 Agustus 2023. Dari :

https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/jpmr/article/view/15733

Iwan Lala.”Motivasi Belajar”. Diunduh 11 Juli 2023. Dari : https://www.academia.edu/36488085/Motivasi_Belajar

Murlani. “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Katolik dan Budi Pekerti dengan Model Mind Mapping pada Kelas X Semester 1 SMA Negeri 6 Madiun Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020”. Dakses pada tanggal 11 Juli 2023. Dari :

https://widyasari-press.com/peningkatan-hasil-belajar-dengan-model-mind-mapping/

Ni Luh Casmini. “Penerapan Metode Mind Mapping untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Kimia siswa kelas XII MIPA SMAN 2 Busungbiu”. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.Vol.3 No.1 (2020). Diakses pada tanggal 11 Juli 2023. Dari :

https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIPPG/article/view/28245

Puput Agustiningtyas, Jun Surjanti. “Peranan Teman Sebaya dan Kebiasaan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Melalui Motivasi Belajar Di Masa Covid-19”. Universitas Pahlawan Vol.3 No.3 (2021). Diakses pada tanggal 12 Juli 2023. Dari :

https://www.edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/454

Regulasi Kurikulum Merdeka diakses 12 Juli 2023. Dari :

https://www.google.com/search?q=undang+undang+kurikulum+merdeka&oq=&aqs=chrome.3.35i39i362l8.5648674j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Sunarti Rahman. “Pentingnya Motivasi Belajar dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar”. (2021) Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Diakses tanggal 12 Juli 2023. Dari :

https://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/PSNPD/article/view/1076

Downloads

Published

2023-08-29

How to Cite

Didit Sugiyarso, & Stepanus Istata Raharjo. (2023). Peningkatan Motivasi Belajar Pak Dengan Model Pbl Materi Gereja Pada Fase F Kelas XI SMKN 3 Magelang. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN DAN AGAMA, 4(1), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.55606/semnaspa.v4i1.384

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.