Meningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Model PBL MMeningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Model PBL Materi Panggilan dan Perutusan Murid Yesus Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 11 Satateri Panggilan dan Perutusan Murid Yesus Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 11 Satap Belimbing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/semnaspa.v5i2.2266Keywords:
Independent curriculum, Catholic religious education, problem-based learningAbstract
The low learning outcomes in Catholic Religious Education subjects are due to learning methods that tend to be monotonous using the same learning model every meeting. To improve learning outcomes, it is tried to use the PBL model Can the PBL method improve PAK learning outcomes? To determine the effectiveness of PBL for PAK learning outcomes, PTK research was conducted in learning the Material of the Call and Mission of the Disciple of Jesus in 2 cycles with the PBL Model, data collection instruments using tests and observation and documentation. The research process was carried out through a class action cycle with the stages of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The results showed that the PBL model can improve learning outcomes. This is evidenced by an increase in the average test results of students' cognitive learning abilities in the first cycle with 50% proficient criteria and in the second cycle increased to 61% proficient criteria. As well as 100% of learners are able to exceed the target of 0% on decent and new developing criteria. Then students also experienced an increase in affective aspects based on observation data on the profile of Pancasila students who reason critically, independently and cooperatively. In the first cycle, the average increase in proficient criteria was 55% and increased in the second cycle to proficient criteria of 67%. Thus it can be concluded that the application of the PBL model is proven to be effective in improving the learning outcomes of Catholic Religious Education (PAK).
References
Abu hamdi dan widodo Supriyono, (1990). Psykologi belajar. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosda Karya.
Aqib zainal, 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Bandung .YramaWidya
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Arikuto
Dimyati dan Mujiono, 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. PT.Rineka Cipta
Hasal hamid, 1992,1993. Evaluasi hasil belajar. Jakarta. Depdikbud
Isjoni 2007, Cooperative learning Efektifitas pembelajaran kelompok. Bandung Alfabeta
Karya.
Komkat KWI. 2020. Belajar Mengikuti Yesus Pendidikan Agama Katolik dan Budi Pekerti untuk SMA Kelas X.Yogyakarta : Kanisius.
Nana Sudjana, 1989. “Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar”. Bandung : CV. Sinar Baru
Nugroho, A. (2022). Lingkungan Belajar dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Siswa. Journal of Educational Research, 37(4), 180-195.
Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 1990. Psikologi Pendidikan, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda
Reber, Muhibbinsyah.1998. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Strategi Baru. Jakarta: Rieneka Cipta.
Saminanto, 2010. Ayo Praktik Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Semarang: Rasail
Slameto, 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhinya .Jakarta:Bumi Aksara. S.M,
Slameto. 1995. Belajar Dan Factor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta : Rineka cipta
Suharsimi Arikunto, 2006.Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Suharsimi,2007. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Bumi Aksara
Tampobolon ,S. (2004). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG SISTEM PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL
Wahyuni, A. (2023). Inovasi Media Pembelajaran di Era Digital: Strategi dan Implementasi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 44(2), 90-105.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN DAN AGAMA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.