Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Katolik dan Budi Pekerti dengan Model Problem Bases Learning (PBL) Melalui Media Power Point pada Materi Gereja Sebagai Umat Allah dan Persekutuan Yang Terbuka Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Silimakuta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/semnaspa.v5i2.2192Keywords:
Collaborative Classroom Action Research (PTKK), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), PowerPoint MediaAbstract
This research is a collaborative class action research (PTKK) carried out in class XI 6 SMA Negeri 1 Silimakuta with a total of 33 students consisting of 12 male students and 21 female students. This study aims to see whether the problem base learning model with powerpoint media can improve student learning outcomes in reviewing church material as God's people and open fellowship. This research is divided into two cycles, each of which consists of identifying problems, planning, implementing actions, observing and collecting data, analyzing data, and reflecting and improving. Data collection was carried out using tests. The results of the study showed that there was an increase in students' learning ability with powerpoint media on the material to increase students' ability in the Church's material for the environment, as evidenced by the average value of student learning outcomes at the end of the first cycle of 65.75 or 27% and at the end of the second cycle was 73.39 or 69.69%. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that learning using the problem base learning model with powerpoint media can improve students' abilities in the material of the Church as the People of God and Open Communion.in grades XI-6 SMA N 1 Silimakuta.
References
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. 9th ed.
Azizah. M. Sulianto J., CIntang, N. 2018. Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Menegah Atas Pada Pembelajaran Agama Katolik Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(1): 61-70.
Darmawan, I. P. A., & Sujoko, E. (2013). Revisi Taksonomi Pembelajaran Benyamin S. Bloom. Satya Widya, 29(1), 30-39
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. The Problem of Training Thought, 14.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions. University of Illinois, 1–8.
Facione P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What it is and why it counts. Measured.
Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Kusumah, Wijaya dan Dedi Dwitagama. (2011). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.
Permendikbud. (2016). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Menengah Atas, 3(1), 56.
Puspaningsih, R, dkk. (2020). Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Kementerian pendidikan, riset, dan teknologi badan penelitian dan pengembangan pusat kurikulum dan perbukuan: Jakarta.
Reasons and the California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA.
Richard W. Paul. (1980). Critical Thinking. Biographical information
Rusman. (2014). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta : Rajagrafindo Persada
Sudjana, Nana. (2012). Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Sudjana. 2005. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdikarya
Susanti, Elli., Astri Sutisnawati., Iis Nurasiah. 2019. Penerapan Model Group Investigation untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di Kelas Tinggi. Jurnal Utile. Vol. 5 (2) 123-133
Trianto, (2011), Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif: Konsep Landasan dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP), Penerbit Prenada Media, Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN DAN AGAMA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.