Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Pada Peserta Didik Kelas VII A SMP Xaverius Metro Materi Yesus Sang Pengampun Dengan Metode Diskusi dan Presentasi

Authors

  • Endi Priyanto SMP Xaverius Metro
  • Sugiyana Sugiyana Sekolah Tinggi Pastoral Kateketik Santo Fransiskus Assisi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/semnaspa.v4i2.1317

Keywords:

motivation, discussion, presentation methods, learning results

Abstract

The problem in this research is whether discussion and presentation methods can increase learning motivation in class VIIA students at Xaverius Metro Middle School. The research method used was the classroom action research (PTK) method which was carried out at Xaverius Metro Middle School on Class VIIA students totaling 28 students. This research was carried out over two actions (cycles). Data collection techniques through observation, questionnaires and learning outcomes tests. The research results showed that there was an increase in motivation, attitudes and learning outcomes through the use of group discussion and presentation methods for class VIIA SMP Xaverius Metro. The increase in this research is quite significant, namely that the independence of students who are developing has decreased from 1 student (3.57%) in cycle I, and to 0 students (0%) in cycle II. The qualification that stated students were quite independent decreased from 12 students (42.86%) in cycle I, and to 10 students (35.71%) in cycle II. The qualifications that stated independent students decreased from 12 students (42.86%) in cycle I, and to 11 students (39.29%) in cycle II. The qualification that states students are very independent has increased from 3 students (10.71%) in cycle I, and to 7 students (25.00%) in cycle II. Students' attitudes increased significantly from 5 students (17.86%) in cycle I, and to 6 students (21.43%) in cycle II. Qualifications that stated they were good decreased from 23 students (82.14%) in cycle I, and to 16 students (57.14%) in cycle II. The qualifications that stated they were very happy had increased from 0 students (0%) in cycle I, and to 7 students (25.00%) in cycle II. The results of the student learning evaluation showed that it was developing, experiencing a decrease from 3 students (10.71%) in cycle I, and to 0 students (0%) in cycle II. The qualifications that stated they were worthy decreased from 10 students (35.71%) in cycle I, and to 4 students (14.29%) in cycle II. Qualifications stating that they were proficient increased from 7 students (25.00%) in cycle I, and to 9 students (32.14%) in cycle II. The qualifications for proficient increased from 8 students (28.57%) in cycle I, and to 15 students (53.57%) in cycle II. This means that the results obtained have met the criteria for completing the lesson objectives (KKTP).

References

Djamarah, S. B. (2008). Strategi belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.

Hadi, Sutrisno. 2001. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.73.

Hasibuan dan Moedjiono. 2002. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kemmis, Stephen and Robin McTaggart (eds). 1988. The Action Research Planner. Deakin University. Australia, Deakin University Press (3rd Edition).

Margono. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 118.

Miftah Toha. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: P.T. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mulyana, Deddy. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Mulyasa, E. 2005. Menjadi Guru Profesional, Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Mulyasa. 2004. Implementasi kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja.

Oemar Hamalik. 1992. Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Rosdakarya. Mulyasa. 2008. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Saiful Rachman, Yoto, Syarif Suhartadi, Suparti. 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Surabaya: SIC Bekerjasama Dengan Dinas P dan K Provinsi Jawa Timur.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. 96

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta. 3.

Surachma, Winarno. 2001. Pengantar Interaksi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Tarsito. 57.

Sutikno, Sobry. 2014. Metode & Model-Model Pembelajaran Menjadikan Proses Pembelajaran Lebih Variatif, Aktif, Inovatif, Efektif, dan Menyenangkan. Lombok: Holistica.

Wandayani Goeyardi. 2022. Penerapan Metode Presentasi untuk meningkatkan Kemampuan berbicara pada Mata Kuliah Berbicara Lanjutan 2 Mahasiswa Sastra Cina, FIB UB. Vol. 2 No. 3 Oktober 2022. Hal. 191 – 200.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-16

How to Cite

Endi Priyanto, & Sugiyana Sugiyana. (2023). Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Pada Peserta Didik Kelas VII A SMP Xaverius Metro Materi Yesus Sang Pengampun Dengan Metode Diskusi dan Presentasi. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN DAN AGAMA, 4(2), 528–547. https://doi.org/10.55606/semnaspa.v4i2.1317

Similar Articles

<< < 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.