Model Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pak Materi Hidup Dalam Roh Kudus Fase C Kelas V SD Negeri Magelang 6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/semnaspa.v4i2.1314Keywords:
Pancasila Student Profile, Learning Outcomes, Discovery Learning ModelAbstract
Concern about student learning outcomes in affective and cognitive aspects is urgent in efforts to raise a young generation with noble and religious morals. The problem of low learning outcomes in Catholic Religious Education which has not yet reached the target of student learning completeness and low moral aspects in humans is a concern. This research was designed to overcome this problem by applying the Discovery Learning learning model. This model emphasizes the active role of students in learning, with the teacher acting as a facilitator. The aim of this research is to improve student learning outcomes in affective aspects, especially morals, and cognitive aspects. This research is classroom action research designed in two cycles, with data collection through observation, interviews, documentation and tests. Indicators of observing morals in humans include 1) Identifying similarities with other people; 2) Make it happen in group activities; 3) Recognize various possible interpretations; 4) Viewing things from other people's perspectives; 5) Identify the goodness and strengths of the people around you. The achievement targets in this research are: 10% Developing According to Expectations and 90% Very Developing. Meanwhile, the cognitive aspect assessment achievement indicators include 90-100 = Proficient, 80-89 = Proficient, 65-79 = Adequate, 0-64 = Medium, with an achievement target of 10% Adequate, 90% Proficient. The results of the research show that the Discovery Learning Model in Catholic Religious Education learning is proven to be able to increase the dimensions of faith, devotion to God Almighty, and noble character in the matter of living in the Holy Spirit, namely from cycle 1 to 2 by 28% and the target achievement and learning achievement values of students in cycle I from 75% adequate, 25% proficient, 0% proficient in cycle II to 75% proficient and 25% proficient. Finally, this research suggests using the Discovery Learning model as an effort to improve the Pancasila Student Profile in the learning process.
References
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bailey, Brian, 2015. Roh Kudus Sang Penghibur. Jakarta: Voice of Hope.
Carlton, j.s. 2007. Marin Proppeler and Propulsion, Elsevier, Oxfoxd. United Kingdom
Dari, F. W., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Model Discovery Learning Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 4(2014), 1469–1479. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/j ptam/article/view/612.
Darmawan, A, C, 2019. Pedoman Praktis Utmbuh Kembang Anak (Usia 0-72 Bulan). Bogor: PT Penerbit IPB Press.
Depdiknas, 2003. Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
Douglas, J.D. dkk. 2008. Tafsiran Alkitab Masa Kini 3. Jakarta: Yayasan Komunikasi Bina Kasih/OMF.
Hartutik dan Isdaryanti, B. 2014. Analisis Kebutuhan Pembelajaran Pendididkan Karakter Terintegrasi dalam Mata pelajaran IPA SD di Kota Semarang. Prociding Seminar Internasional Unnes.
Hartutik, Rusdarti, Sumaryanto, & Supartono. 2017. Integrating Character Education Model with Spiral System in Chemistry Subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012025
Hartutik. 2019. Evaluasi Kompetensi Mahasiswa PPL sebagai Calon Guru Pendidikan Agama Katolik Berkarakter Kreatif. In Y. L. Sukestiyarno (Ed.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Agama. STIPAS Keuskupan Agung Semarang. (pp. 32–40). STIPAS KAK Kupang.
______ 2019. Management Model for Integrating Character Education Training in School Learning with the Spiral System. Knowledge E Social Sciences, 99–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i18.4702
______ 2021. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Teori & Praktek Analisa Perangkat Tes. Semarang: Unnes Press
Hartutik, & Sukestiyarno. 2021. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Penyusunan proposal-Laporan dan Artikel (Pertama). Unnes Press.
Jamaludin, Adon Nasrullah. (2011). Metode Penulisan Skripsi untuk Mahasiswa. Bandung.
John R.W. Stott. 2003. Efesus. Jakarta: Yayasan Komunikasi Bina Kasih.
Kemendikbudristek. 2022. Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Nomor 009/H/Kr/2022 Tentang Dimensi, Elemen, Dan Subelemen Profil Pelajar Pancasila Pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Kemendikbudristek. 2022. Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 56/M/2022 Tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum Dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi
Lexy J. Moleong, (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung, PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mahmuddin. 2007. Membentuk Karakter Kreatif dan Produktif melalui Siklus Belajar. https://mahmuddin.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/membentuk-karakter-kreatif-dan-produktif-melalui-siklus-belajar/
Marta, Hilda, Yanti Fitria, Hadiyanto Hadiyanto, and Ahmad Zikri. 2020. “Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Basicedu 4 (1): 149–57.
Nurani, D. 2022. Edisi Serba-Serbi Kurikulum Merdeka Kekhasan Sekolah Dasar. Tim Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran (Puskurjar), BSKAP.
Objantoro, Enggar, “Pluralisme Agama-Agama: Tantangan bagi Teologi Kristen,” Jurnal Simpson: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen Vol. I No. 1 (Juli 2014): 61-80.
Riniwati, Harsuko. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Aktivitas Utama dan Pengembangan SDM). Malang: UB Press.
Risdian, 2012. Makna Hidup Bersama. Diakses 8 Januari 2012 dari https://breadofwisdom.blogspot.com/2012/01/makna-hidup-bersama.html
Sinambela, H Jetti. (2019). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP [Tesis]. Medan: UNIMED.
Singgih Santoso. 2015. AMOS 22 untuk Structural Equation Modelling, Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung; PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukestiyarno, Y. L. 2021. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Alem Print
Trianto. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu, Konsep, Strategi dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN DAN AGAMA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.