PENGARUH UKURAN PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP MANAJEMEN LABA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurnalrisetilmuakuntansi.v1i4.118Keywords:
Firm size, earnings management, agency theory, signaling theory, size hypothesisAbstract
This study investigated size effect to earnings management. In this study, it is investigated whether medium and large-sized firm more aggressive to use earnings management through reporting positive earnings to avoid losses and/or earnings decreases by examining the earnings (change) frequency distribution and probit analysis. Docu-mented is empirical evidence that small-, medium- and large-sized firms tend to report positive earnings to avoid earnings losses. However, this study observed that firm size plays differing roles in earnings management. This study found that medium-and large-sized firms do not engage more earnings management aggressively than small firms for both avoiding reporting earnings losses and earnings decreases.
References
Adam, Brian. 2006. Earnings Management and Initial Public Offerings: The Case of the Depository Industry, (www.iupui.edu)
Aerts, Walter, Denis Cormier dan Michael Magnan. 2006. Corporate Environmental Disclosure, Financial Market and Media: An Interational Perspective. Canada: Concordia University (www.ucam.ca).
Agnes Utari Widyaningdyah. 2001. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Earning Management Pada Perusahaan Go Public di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol 3. No. 2.
Aharony, J., Lin, C. J. dan Loeb, M. P. 1993. Initial Public Offering, Accounting Choices, and Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounti g R s%arch, 10 (1)
Ali, Ashiq and Ucran, Oktay. 2006. Dividend Increases and Future Profitability. The University of Texas ([email protected]).
Anderson, K., Deli, D. Gillan, S. 2003. Boards of Directors, Audit Committees, and The Information Content of Earnings, Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. (http://papers.ssrn.com)
Anilarya. 2005. Performance measurement manipulation: Cherry-picking what to Correct.
Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. (http://papers.ssrn.com) Arya, A., J. Glover, and S. Sunder. 2003. Are Unmanaged Earnings Always Better for
Shareholders? Accounting Horizons (supplement)
Ashari, N., Koh, H.C., Tan, S.L. dan Wang. W.H. 1994. Factor Affecting Income Smooth- ing Among Listed Companies in Singapore. Accounting Business Research. Vol 24 (96), hlm. 291–301.
Baharuddin, Ishar dan Heru Satya Nugraha. 2008. Praktik Earnings Management Perusahaan Publik Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, Vol. 10, No. 2, Hlm. 69-80.
Baiman, Stanley. 1990. Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Second Look,
Accounting, Organization & Society, Vol.15, No.4 .
Barton, J., dan P. Simko. 2002. The Balance Sheet as an Earnings Management Constraint.
The Accounting Review, Vol. 77 (Supplement).
Bartov, E. 1993. The Timing of Asset Sales and Earnings Manipulation. The Accounting Review, Vol. 68.
Bartov, E, D. Givoly, dan C. Hayn. 2002, The Rewards to Meeting or Beating Earnings Expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 33
Belkaoui, A. dan Karpik, P.G. 1989. Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1.
Benartzi, S., Michaely, R., Thaler, R., 1997. Do Changes in Dividends Signal the Future or the Past?. Journal of Finance, Vol 52
Beneish, M. D. 2001, Incentive and Penalties Related to earnings Overstatement That Violate GAAP. The Accounting Review, Vol 74
Bricker, Robert and Nandini Chandar. 1998. On Applying Agency Theory in Historical Accounting Research. Business and Economic History. Vol. 27. No. 2
Burgstahler, D. dan I. Dichev. 1997, Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, No 1.
Burgstahler, D. 1998. Incentives to Manage Earnings to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses: Evidence from Quarterly Earnings. Working paper, University of Washington.
Cahan, S. F. 1992. The Effects of Antitrust Investigations on Discretionary Accruals: A Refined Test of Political-Cost Hypothesis. The Accounting Review, Vol. 67, No1.
Cai, Hua. 2005. Bonding, Law Enforcement and Corporate Gorvernance in China. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. Working Paper. (http://papers.ssrn.com)
Chaney P.K dan Lewis C.M, 1995, Earnings Management and Firm Valuation under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 1, No. 3.
Ching, Ken M.L., Michael Firth, dan Oliver M. Rui. 2002. Earnings Management, Corporate Governance and the Market Performance of Seasoned Equity Offerings. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. Working Paper (http://papers.ssrn.com).
Chtourou, S., Bedard, J., Courteau, L. 2001. Corporate Governance and Earnings Mana- gement”. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. Working Paper (http://papers.ssrn.com).
Connie L., Becker Mark L. DeFond, James Jiambalvo, dan K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. “The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, No. 15.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1986, Accounting Numbers as Market Valuation Substitutes: A Study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholders. The Accounting Review, Vol. 61, No. 2.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1988. Managerial Competition, Information Costs, and Corporate Governance: The Use of Accounting Performance Measures in Proxy contents”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 10.
Dechow, and R. G. Sloan. 1991. Executive Incentives and the Horizon Problem: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 14.
Dechow, P.M., R.G. Sloan, dan A.P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting Earnings Manajemen.
Accounting and Business Research. Vol. 70, No. 2.
Dechow, P.M., R.G. Sloan, dan A.P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 13.
Demski, J. 1998. Performance Measure Manipulation. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 15.
Degeorge, F., J. Patel, dan R. Zeckhauser. 1999, Earnings Management to Exceed Thresholds.
Journal of Business, Vol. 72, No. 1.
Dye, R. A. 1988. Earnings Management in an Overlapping Generations Mode@. J u nal of Accounting Research, Vol. 26, No. 2.
Fama, E and Jensen M. 1998. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3, No. 4
Fama, E., Jensen, M. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26.
Fischer, P.E., dan R.E. Verrecchia. 2000. Reporting Bias. The Accounting Review. Vol. 75. Healy, P. 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of
Accounting and Economic, Vol. 7.
Hielda Rossieta. 2002. Accounting Information and Monitoring System in The Context of Agency Relationship. Usahawan, No. 12 Tahun XXXI.
Hayn, C., 1995. The Information Content of Losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 20.
Holthausen, R. W. 1990. Accounting method choice: opportunistic behavior, Efficient contracting and information perspectives, Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 12.
Holthausen, R. W., Larke, K. M., dan Sloan, R. G. 1995. Annual Bonus Schemes and the Manipulation of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12.
Imam Ghozali. 2006, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Cetakan ke IV. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Jensen, Michael C dan William H Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 3.
Jensen, Michael C. dan Kevin J. Murphy. 1990. Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98.
Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 29, No. 2.
Kim, Yangseon., Caixing Liu dan S. Ghon Rhee. 2003. The Effect of Size on Earnings Management. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. (http://papers.ssrn.com)
Lennox, C. 1999. Are Large Auditors More Accurate Than Small Auditors?.Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 29, No. 3.
Lev, B. 1988, Toward A Theory of Equitable and Efficient Accounting Policy. The Accounting Review, Vol 43, No. 1.
Moses, O.D. 1987. Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Tests Using Accounting Changes. The Accounting Review. Vol 62, No. 2.
Nasser, E.M. & Herlina. 2003. Pengaruh Size, Profitabilitas dan Leverage terhadap Perataan Laba pada Perusahaan go Publik. Jurnal Ekonomi. Vol. 7, No. 3.
Pourciau, A. 1993. Earnings Management and Nonroutine Executives Changes. Journal of Accounting Economics, Vol 16, No. 3.
Ross, Stephen A 1973. The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem, American Economic Association, Vol. 63, No..2.
Setiawati, Lilis dan Ainun Naim. 2000. Manajemen Laba, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol. 15, No. 4.
Shleifer, A. dan R. Vishny. 1986. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 3.
Siregar, P.N., Veronica, Sylvia dan Siddharta Utama. 2005. Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Praktek Corporate Governance terhadap Pengelolaan Laba (Earnings Manajemen). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VII. Vol. 9. No. 3.
Trueman, B., & Titman, S. 1988. An Explanation for Accounting Income Smoothing.
Jounal of Accounting Research (Supplement), Vol 26, No. 3.
Watts. R.L. & Zimmerman. J.L. 1978. Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, Vol. 53, No. 1.
Watts, Ross L., and J L Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Xiaopeng, Zou and Xuejie, Chen. 2002. Earnings Management of Chinese Listed Companies: A Survey of Empiricial Study. China & World Economy. No. 4.
Zulfa Irawati dan Anugerah Maya. A. 2004. Analisis Perataan Laba (Income Smoothing): Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Return dan Risiko Saham Perusahaan Go Public di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Benefit. Vol. 11, No. 1.
